|
Los Angeles Times Tuesday, July 27, 1999
PERSPECTIVES ON FEDERAL SPENDING
Build On, Repair What We Have
The debate over how to allocate funds must include how best to
improve our great shared assets.
By RALPH NADER
New projections of a federal budget surplus have left Washington abuzz
with proposals on how the government should allocate hundreds of billions
of dollars. Strikingly absent from the debate are recommendations to
revitalize our commonwealth by investing in a public works
program.
At no time in recent history has a program to
construct, rebuild or repair crumbling bridges, schools, drinking water
facilities, sewer lines, docks, parks, mass transit systems, libraries, clinics,
courthouses and other public amenities and infrastructure been so urgent
or achievable. Too many of our roads and bridges are decrepit; school
roofs across the nation are leaking or falling in; the public water system does
not deliver safe drinking water for millions; the reach of public transportation
systems is dwindling; the great national park system is seriously
decaying--and this is only the beginning of the list. It is past time to
commence a major public works initiative to repair this great storehouse of
shared wealth. Federal, state and local governments
already spend substantial funds on various public works projects, most notably
highway construction. And a modest debate is now percolating on federal support
for school building construction. But current expenditures are hugely inadequate
to meet many of our most pressing public works needs.
Consider the following:
* One in three schools across the United States is
"in need of extensive repair or replacement," according to a 1995
General Accounting Office report. Fixing the schools, the GAO estimates, will
cost $113 billion over three years. * The Centers
for Disease Control estimates 1 million people become sick every year from bad
water, with about 900 deaths occurring. The EPA estimates nearly $140 billion
will be needed over the next 20 years for water system investments to
install, upgrade or replace failing drinking water infrastructure.
* Maintaining the public transit system at current
levels, the Department of Transportation estimates, will cost $9.7 billion a
year. Improving the infrastructure to a condition of "good" would
require upping annual expenditures to $14.2 billion a year. However, maintaining
or slightly upgrading the public transit is not nearly enough. Bold new
investments are needed to create a modern mass transit system conducive to
livable cities, one which will bring community residents closer together, combat
the momentum toward sprawl, guarantee lower-income groups the ability to travel
efficiently in metropolitan areas, abate air pollution and improve
transportation safety. * As a society we have
failed to respect the foresight of Theodore Roosevelt, John Muir and other
conservationist founders of the national park system, neglecting to invest
sufficient resources to maintain, let alone properly expand, the parks. A
National Park Service-estimated funding gap of nearly $9 billion has left animal
populations at risk, park amenities in substandard or unusable conditions and
many national historical artifacts in danger of being lost to posterity.
Investments in public works--those mentioned here,
plus others,such as construction of public health clinics, libraries, sewers and
courthouses; bridge and road repair, and cleanup efforts of military and nuclear
waste sites--make our communities stronger and more closely knit. While many of
these community benefits do not accrue in citizens' personal bank accounts, they
do register in direct and discernible improvements in every person's life.
Investing in and protecting our great public assets makes us richer as a nation
and a people. Public investments also strengthen the economy through a
better-educated and healthier work force and through efficient transportation of
goods and people. Historically, investments in
public works have been a key spur to private wealth creation. A national public
works plan, Franklin Roosevelt said in his 1934 State of the Union speech,
"will, in a generation or two, return many times the money spent on it . .
. More important, it will conserve our natural resources, prevent waste and
enable millions of our people to take better advantage of the opportunities
which God has given our country." This--an era
of burgeoning private wealth and large projected public surplus--is the time to
reinvigorate our public investments. - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ralph Nader Is a Consumer Advocate and Author of "No Contest: How
the Power Lawyers Are Perverting Justice in America" (Random House,
1996)
Return to Ralph Nader's testimony on Corporate Welfare
Return to Nader Page
Return to Essential Information
|