|
The New York Times
November 6, 1999 Toughen Up the Rules of the Sky By Ralph Nader and Paul Hudson; Ralph Nader is co-author of "Collision Course: The Truth about Airline Safety." Paul Hudson directs the Aviation Consumer Action Project.
The federal government is expert at recovering wreckage, but not so good at preventing wrecks. We don't know what caused this week's crash. But the Federal Aviation Administration could take action right now to prevent future crashes. It could toughen safety rules that airlines must follow and require the adoption of safety devices and techniques used elsewhere.
For example, in 1997, after its investigation
of the Trans World Airlines Flight 800 crash off Long Island, the
transportation safety board insisted in its report that the F.A.A.
take action to reduce the danger of explosions in center fuel tanks,
which are in the body of the plane rather than in the wings. One
remedy would be to have airlines adopt technology from military
aircraft that use foam and other materials inside tanks to keep
oxygen from getting near the fuel. The next year, an F.A.A. advisory
panel found that center fuel tanks in most American airliners were
dangerously hot 30 percent of their operating time because they were
placed next to heat
Poorly placed fuel tanks are not the only fire
hazard the agency has failed to address adequately. It should
require that smoke detectors and heat-activated systems to release
foam or other fire suppressants be placed in all areas that are
inaccessible to an airplane's crew. The fire that
The agency should also require all American
airplanes to carry up-to-date black boxes, which have their own
internal power sources and gather far more data than older models
and record cockpit voices for much longer periods. Boxes like this,
used by many European airlines, send The agency is also allowing dangerous practices on the ground. For instance, at many airports intersecting runways are now used simultaneously. And at busy airports, an airplane can be cleared to land or take off on a runway before the plane already on the runway has left it. This has led to at least two near-misses at Chicago's O'Hare International Airport and a steady increase in incidents of planes moving inadvertently onto runway space assigned to other aircraft. Cargo and mail are still being loaded onto passenger jets without being screened for explosives or radioactivity, although two presidential commissions on aviation security have recommended that the practice no longer be allowed. In some areas it regulates, the aviation agency is not even living up to the safety requirements in its rule books. For example, it is allowing safety systems in some new airliner designs to be evaluated by analysis based on past tests, mathematical models and computer simulations, rather than requiring actual testing. The agency waived full-scale emergency evacuation tests for the Boeing 777-300, for example, and certified the plane in 1998 to carry 550 occupants even though actual tests had been used only for a smaller model model (the Boeing 777-200) that carried 419 people.
Every year, the agency also grants the airline
industry an astounding 300 waivers or exemptions from federal safety
rules. For example, while a rule requires that the aisle between
seats leading to emergency window exits be 20 inches wide, the
F.A.A. has made exceptions to allow spaces
It is true that commercial air travel
continues to be among the safest forms of travel. But if standards
are not kept high, the industry's record could quickly deteriorate.
To assure that they are, the United States should establish an
independent federal aviation safety and security agency, leaving the
F.A.A. to operate air traffic control. Congress should also form
an Neglecting air safety is like stretching a rubber band. At a certain point, the rubber band snaps.
Return to Nader Page Return to Essential Information |